The impact of Laboratory-Based Diagnosis of Synthetic Cannabinoids in the Emergency Department on Treatment, Length of Stay, and Prognosis
Laboratory Diagnosis of Synthetic Cannabinoids in ED
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15619576Keywords:
Synthetic Cannabinoid, Emergency Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders, Laboratory, Prognosis, DiagnosisAbstract
Introduction: Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are a structurally diverse class of synthetic substances frequently misused as recreational drugs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of laboratory-confirmed SC use on the treatment process, length of stay in the emergency department (ED), and patient prognosis in individuals presenting to the ED with a reported history of SC use.
Methods: This prospective observational study included ED patients aged 18–75 years with self-reported synthetic cannabinoid use. Laboratory tests, including SC levels in blood and urine, were conducted. SC-positive and SC-negative patients were compared in terms of lab findings, treatment, ED stay, and prognosis.
Results: The study included 101 patients (95% male, mean age 25.8 years). Most presented with symptoms (55.4%) or for addiction treatment (44.6%), commonly reporting fatigue, nausea, agitation, and palpitations. SC was detected in 6.9% of urine samples. No significant lab differences were found between SC-positive and negative patients, except for slightly lower SpO₂ levels in SC-positives. ED stay duration and patient outcomes were similar across groups, with 97% discharged and 3% monitored in the ICU.
Conclusion: The laboratory diagnosis of synthetic cannabinoids in patients presenting to the ED did not significantly affect treatment outcomes, ED length of stay, or prognosis.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Current Medical and Biological Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.